Wonderful Witches and their Adversaries
Wonderful witches always oppose injustices. They also oppose chaos.
How do you know when a system is unjust?
What do you know about systematic injustice and systematic justice?
What do you know about unsystematic injustice and unsystematic justice?
Perhaps you always regard yourself on the side of goodness and opposed to evil.
How, though, do you interpret ambiguities?
How do you know you have not deceived yourself regarding perceived adversarial intentions?
Who opposes you and/or your actions and/or your beliefs, and why, and how can you be sure?
Yet it is not possible to oppose the truth in scientific terms.
To oppose the truth is political.
Calling scientists adversaries when they have formed differing conclusions about the truth is the same as calling them egotists.
They always support justice, in all its forms.
The excessive desires for order is unjust. It may even be a sign of a disordered mind.
How do you know when order is excessive?
How do you know when order is inadequate?
How do you know when approaches to achieving and/or maintaining order are unjust?
Wonderful witches are adversaries of deceivers and bullies.
What do you already know about wonderful witches, and how have you acquired that information?
Do you always answer questions in good faith?
Wonderful witches have immense faith in good faith and good reasoning.
Purposeful reviews of research, and other events, may reflect a wide variety of methodologies.
When have you most recently conducted a purposeful review of intelligent frugality, and for what purpose?
Far too many people give away their privacy with the intention of receiving economic advantages by doing so.
Perhaps you already have at least a little influence in that regard yet you want to acquire more.
Perhaps you are afraid of the true heights of good thinking and other good practices.
Wonderful witches often prefer to act with subtlety rather than overtly. They do not usually wish to display their influence too blatantly.
Perhaps you do not usually associate cultural leadership with asking uncomfortable questions.
Truly good people try to prevent bullies from exploiting vulnerabilities.
That is why wonderful witches are truly good and truly wise. They learn from history, from philosophy, and from science.
Perhaps you only value items and experiences you appreciate in terms of money and/or prestige.
How imaginatively and healthily do you produce crops and/or prepare food, whether on an industrial scale or otherwise?
How do you know you have a well-informed approach to placing value of
creativity, problem-solving, frugality, productivity and kindness?
Where have you been seeking enlightenment for the past few years?
Where have you actually found enlightenment, and how do you know?
How have you been defining enlightenment, and why?
How do you reflect back on the achievements you have experienced in life?
How do you reflect upon your joys more generally?
How do you reflect upon the difficulties you have faced in the past?
How have you assessed the difficulties you currently face, and the problems you are seeking to address?
How do you zone the world philosophically?
What have you been learning about, and from, the wonderful witches of Australia, Austria, Italy, Scotland, France and other parts of the world?
What do you know about the attitude of governments towards the arts, humanities and social sciences?
Perhaps you have difficult defining and describing ways to invest in better governments.
Perhaps you have difficulty defining well-informed kindness.
Perhaps you have difficulty defining well-informed investing.
Who believes "the market" will make the world "great again", and why?
What do you know about political power in relation to finance and inadequate financial systems?
Quality politics is all about solving problems collectively.
Only corrupt politics is otherwise.In all parts of the world, the judiciary rarely does anything to prevent political corruption, in reality.
Journalists rarely do anything to prevent political corruption, in reality.
Academics rarely do anything to prevent political corruption, in reality.
The military rarely does anything to prevent political corruption, in reality.
Heads of state rarely do anything to prevent political corruption, in reality.How do you tell the difference between reality, allegories and allegations?
How do you assess the influence of family relationships and banking relationships and political relationships?
Necessary conservation is the opposite of corruption.
What have you most recently been involved in conserving, and why?
How have you attempted to learn the truth in relation to conservation measures?
How have you attempted to learn the truth about various techniques aimed at making improvements?
Unless political power is shared fairly, governments will always be evil.
The good within any government soon dies when power is abused.
But what causes stability?
How do you know when a claim of providing stability is actually abusive?
What do you know about the practices of wonderful witches in relation to stability of all necessary varieties?
- Learning the Truth about Witches
- The Ghost of Queen Adelaide
- The Civility Journalism Circle
- Floating Like a Real Witch
Perhaps you are a tabloid journalist or another form of one-dimensional ignoramus.
How do you usually think about permanence and ephemerality in relation to quality journalism, quality politics and other quality expressions of the arts and sciences?
How do you usually think about quality of life in relation to quality journalism, quality politics and other quality expressions of the
arts and sciences?
How
are you addressing the failures of journalists, and rich people, to
provide quality journalism, and other forms of quality education, where and when it is most needed, in the most
suitable formats, for the people most urgently in need it, in the
public interest?
Incivility is unreasonable even though it is not necessarily inelegant.
Incompatibility is often inevitable when incivility is evident.
Quaternary educational experiences are primarily suitable for real world leaders, not ordinary members of the public.
What do you know about quality democracies?
- Understanding the Impossible
- A Political Incantation for Peace and Justice
- The Enlightened Re-enchantment of the World - Part Three
All investments are, in practice, investments in people, even when the main aim is to improve a natural environment.
Wonderful witches are wonderful investors.
Wonderful witches consistently invest in mutually beneficial pleasantness, in the public interest.
How do you define the meaning of community in various contexts?
How do you assess dependence, independence and interdependence?
Perhaps you mainly care for, and about, yourself and/or members of your family.
Perhaps you mainly associate investments with competitiveness and other speculative practices.
Perhaps you do not regard competition as essentially speculative at all.
Perhaps you do not regard care as an investment, or even as an emotion or ethical stance.
What is your current knowledge of well-informed investing and how did you acquire it?
What is your current knowledge of wonderful witches and their adversaries, and how did you acquire that knowledge?
And why are those goals important to you at present?
What have been your previous experiences of adversaries, particularly those opposed to your goals?
How do you usually assess disadvantage?
How do you distinguish between privilege and merit?
How much of your knowledge, on any particular subject, is actually associated with your experiences of privilege?
How much of your knowledge of particular subjects is associated with your experiences of disadvantage?
When do you regard a social situation as deserving of your friendliness, your compassion and even your friendship, and why?
When do you regard a social situation as unworthy of your efforts towards friendship?
Perhaps you are currently feeling confused.
Perhaps you are wondering whether you are an adversary of wonderful witches, with or without really knowing the truth.
Perhaps you are wondering how wonderful witches behave towards their adversaries.
How do you attempt to distinguish between fact and fiction if not through the assessment of evidence?
Who are you to yourself, and where and how do you usually acquire knowledge of yourself?
What is your acquaintance conservation and restoration processes?
How do you compare one place with another?
How do you compare one time with another?
How do you compare societies over time?
Perhaps you mistake money-related work for the most important work required of you.
The most important work of anyone involves making accurate comparisons.
Perhaps you have power in the digital world.
Perhaps you have power through the mass media and/or social media.
Perhaps you use your power to influence situations in reasonable ways.
Perhaps you do not.
Yet most of your personal achievements are not only a consequence of the innate abilities you possess. They are not even associated considerably with the time and effort you have put towards developing those abilities.
Your personal achievements are a consequence of the mental, physical, financial and political support you have received. Those supportive efforts have provided you with the freedom to achieve particular goals.
How do you attempt to express initiative towards improving the minds, lives and manners of ordinary mortals?
How do you assess the cruelty of rudeness?
How do you assess the cruelty of greed?
What do you know about the characteristics of abusers?
Why are the vulnerable so often treated cruelly?
When does your expenditure destroy your income and when does it enhance your wealth?
What are the sources of your wealth?
What were your ancestors doing two centuries ago, three centuries ago, four centuries ago, and five centuries ago, and how do you know?
Perhaps you believe you are currently highly informed about the world.
If so, that is likely to be a sign of your ignorance, not your awareness.
What are you attempting to achieve through your paid and unpaid activities, and why, and where?
How do you usually distinguish between appropriate practices and worthy causes?
Perhaps you use a smartphone or digital tablet or another sort of computational machine as your commonplace book.
Perhaps you have little acquaintance with commonplace books of any sort, whether digital or otherwise.
Perhaps you have little acquaintance with grimoires and their history.
When do you regard a situation as deserving of your patronage?
When do you regard a situation as deserving of your time and effort in other ways?
Wonderful witches are enlightened philanthropists, enlightened patrons and enlightened investors.
Do you consider yourself to be a philanthropic sort of investor or a controversial one?
Perhaps you regard all philanthropy as controversial.
Do you currently have a reputation as a successful investor in advanced social, political, economic and environmental practices?
If so, with whom do you have that reputation, and why?
The world is zoned in various ways, both scientifically and politically.
What do you know about the public domain, the public sphere and the public interest?
When, if ever, have you attempted to protect anyone, possibly including yourself, from abusive experiences?
When, if ever, have you discovered that government 'authorities' do not care about sufferers and may possibly even enjoy exacerbating, and even causing, suffering?
How do you define successful philanthropy?
How do you define quality patronage?
Investing appropriately in good patronage is an essential skill. It is usually dependent upon amazingly successful planning for its success, in much the same way as quality investing and quality philanthropy.
Quality leadership is an ability required of, and by, everyone competently involved in the process of improving the world.
Perhaps you are a petty person.
Perhaps you are a bully.
What have you been learning about adversaries, including your own adversaries, over the past few years and/or decades?
If you usually associate prosecutors with persecutors, perhaps you have been a victim of an unjust legal system and/or another unjust system
When do you treat a person with deference, and why?
When do you treat a person with contempt, and why?
How do you know when a person arrogantly expects deference rather than simple courtesy?
How do you address the despicable, the shameful and the demeaning?
How do you address distinguished persons, and how do you identify and acknowledge and define their qualities?
What have been your experiences of power struggles and power voids and abuses of power?
How does your management of adversaries contribute to political pleasantness?
Perhaps you regard ambiguity as evil.
Perhaps you regard all uncertainty as evil.
Perhaps you have dualistic cosmological beliefs about opposing powers, opposing forces, opposing opinions and/or opposing intentions.
How do you usually assess physical entities and non-physical entities?
What do you know about noble metals, noble gases, noble thoughts and noble practices?How do you know when a theory or practice is superior or inferior?
Encouraging scientists to become less egotistical can be achieved by encouraging egotistical scientists to work together.
But how do you assess biases in relation to politics, religion and other such matters?
What do you own and why do you own it?
What do you prefer not to own, and why?
What do you prefer not to share, and why?Who do you regard as an éminence grise, and why?
Comments
Post a Comment